Don't leave your money on the street.

Bitcoind is labelled as the backend of the network. When I explain this to friends I explain it like its the router that you have stuffed behind the sofa or if you are more professional, in a server room, sometimes not even in the same country you are in. Either way, it is something needed for everything else to work. But mostly ignored.

This is how I imagine the users of Bitcoin Classic to use the software, and it is the way I think it should be. They use it as something that just works to make it possible for them to keep their business or infrastructure running.

One such group of Bitcoin Classic users are the miners, they run bitcoin-classic to have an accurate view of the state of the network. The new transactions are collected in Bitcoin Classic and it creates new block templates for them. In short; Bitcoin Classic helps miners connect to the network.

What is totally out-of-character with the design that Bitcoin has had for years is that, when the miner actually mines the block that the block-reward is "stored" in the Bitcoin node.

This means that your Bitcoin Classic suddenly isn't just a piece of network infrastructure anymore. It holds thousands of dollars worth of value. And because of that you'd have to protect it. Which is not always compatible with the way that you want to use a piece of network infrastructure.

See, the original Bitcoin node that Satoshi made was a reference client and it included the ability to relay messages, it has a wallet and it knows how to mine blocks.

Over the years we stopped using the mining software because other software and hardware solutions have appeared that were much better.

We have also seen many better wallets which are much more used than a full node based wallet.

All of those still use the bitcoin full node software, like Bitcoin Classic, as a platform to build on. They communicate via various channels with the Bitcoin software which in turn connects them to the Bitcoin Network.

It is in my opinion time to separate Bitcoin Mining from the Bitcoin Wallet. We should no longer force Miners to use the Bitcoin wallet that is shipped in Bitcoin Classic. We should no longer force the horrible security practice of storing bitcoin private keys (and the money they represent) on a piece of equipment that really is meant to be like a router or a hub connecting your business to the Bitcoin network.

Stop demanding a wallet in a mining node

In Bitcoin Classic's development branch we have changed the system to allow mining on a node that does not have a wallet compiled in.

I introduced a new RPC command called createaddress, which returns something like this;

  "address": "1E852VpivAYpZcwGo5bNB9U4twjnJfrL2c",
  "private": "KyjwYTJrhAS14fV7fP16Z9bhiudpPcSTT5HpPgpoampS57zgT59w"

The private key is the one piece of information needed to later spent the money that would be stored on the address. To benefit from this change the miner would store this private key in a secure location.

The pubkey and the address are not needed to be stored securely, they can be used in future mined blocks. When a block is mined with the pubkey set, the money can later be redeemed using the safely stored private key.

A second new RPC command is setcoinbase. When called with the 'pubkey' field from above this will cause any following calls to getblocktemplate to be generated so when it is mined all the fees and block reward will go to the address.

People can use the output of createaddress, or if they don't like change, just use the existing getnewaddress and validateaddress rpc calls to create a coinbase that will end up in your bitcoind wallet.

Additionally the command-line option --gencoinbase is added to bitcoind which has the same effect as the setcoinbase RPC command and that may be useful to use until the mining software is upgraded to use these new RPC commands. Because calling getblocktemplate without setting the coinbase will now cause an error to be returned.

This change is still only available on the development branch, and has not been scheduled for release just yet. So there is still time to give feedback on what you like or dislike or would like to change.

In my opinion these changes will have the positive effect that miners can now feel much more safe when their bitcoind connects them to the bitcoin network, without needing all the security that a full wallet should have.