Bitcoin Classic is about 1 year old, so let’s take a quick look back.
When Bitcoin Classic was founded, our goal was to work with the established Bitcoin development teams and grow Bitcoin on-chain. The obvious and only factor we were focused on was the limit on the size of blocks. Bitcoin Classic compromised - deeply. We went for the most conservative possible increase in block size. From 1MB to 2MB.
The response we triggered, within days of the release was shocking. Several miners, developers and the BlockStream company president agreed that Bitcoin Classic was not allowed to compete with the bitcoin establishment, and they made their proclamations publicly and openly.
In the following months the implications of this action began to sink in. Those who want Bitcoin to grow to allow more users realised compromise with the establishment was a mistake. After a year of working together, compromises and peace offerings, the establishment didn't just reject all of them, it actually rejected the idea of decentralisation and open discussion.
In the latest version of Bitcoin Classic we no longer compromise. The user is at the forefront and we have listened to the many voices which, today find the system to be slow and expensive.
The solution, included in Bitcoin Classic 1.2, takes the power of setting the maximum block size away from the “establishment”, those who have shown they cannot be trusted to represent the bitcoin community.
They have shown they are not tolerant of open discussions nor educated disagreement, and these established developers have abused their first-mover position, to centralise decision making power in Bitcoin, the first decentralized P2P currency.
Power in Bitcoin is decentralized by design.
Centralized decision making is successful when people trust and support the software organization, without the need for questioning the established group of developers. However, the true power lies with all of the individual participants in the network. Only for as long as individuals keep running centralized software, using centralized services and tolerating centralized solutions will any established group have power over Bitcoin.
The solution for the block size debate is to remove the ability of software developers to set a maximum block size limit. Instead, give the power of this limit to the people. The limit can now be set by the full node operator, the exchanges, the online wallets and the home users.
Because with Bitcoin we can route around centralised decision making. Bitcoin Classic joins Bitcoin Unlimited to give people the tools to do so. People running one of these Bitcoin clients no longer have a block size limit.
But make no mistake - this is not a fight between software groups.
To be clear: because Bitcoin is decentralised in all aspects, we all decide what Bitcoin is, by running code and participating in the system. If we want to change something, we chose different code and when the collective joins you in your choice, Bitcoin changes - for the better.
Every participant makes their own choice following their own self best interest within the collective system. There is nothing in the code or system that prevents this from happening. In fact it is deeply embedded in Bitcoin as a dynamic system that evolves and grows without any centralized decision making.
You have to stand up for your opinion because nobody else can.
People like you can make their voice heard by doing something as simple as running Bitcoin Classic. You can also find other ways to make your voice heard by writing to companies that are undecided and explain your position or simply link to this text.
Bitcoin Classic works for the people, and if people act to maintain Bitcoin as a decentralized project, the best will happen.